SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

German and Dutch National U.L. Championships?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Gravon - Das Spielerparadies Forum Index -> Stratego-Archiv
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
acerimmer
Alter Hase


Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 725
Location: England

PostPosted: 18.12.2006 00:03    Post subject: German and Dutch National U.L. Championships? Reply with quote

Would anyone like me to organise a German U.L. Championships.........and a Dutch U.L. Championships?

Obviously I would need a german player willing and able to translate....... for the non english speaking German players.
Likewise I would need a dutch player who could translate into dutch.......for non english speaking dutch players.

From my reckoning..........these 2 tourneaments could be quite successful.

Here are just some of the German U.L. players who could play in a German U.L. Championship.

Glueckritter
Toe
Andi
atillares
Grizzlybear
mister x
Mind
Stratego
edbomb
giovedi
dc annies
Nathanel
Meiko
Iceman
skywalker
endever


And here are just some of the dutch U.L. players who could take part in a Dutch U.L. Championships.

Lion
ruben87
riskytom
ricardo90
wellington
leto
lightwing
eindhoven
bom
BigRob

If we had go ahead with these U.L. National Championships........all the games would be played on gravon............and the tournaments would start sometime in January 2007.

Let me know your views......if there is enough response.......we will gladly organise this for the U.L. players of Germany and the Netherlands.

Cheers,

Ace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ruben87
Gravon Administrator


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1220
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: 18.12.2006 18:55    Post subject: Reply with quote

The idea is nice Ace, but I think half of the dutch list doesnt want to participate. And I am afraid, German list the same thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
acerimmer
Alter Hase


Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 725
Location: England

PostPosted: 18.12.2006 20:03    Post subject: Reply with quote

participation is not compulsary

BUT

I think we could get 50% of the players on the list above......to play.

I put up 16 german UL players and 10 dutch UL players.

I think it is an achievable target to try to get a minimum of 8 german players for the german championship and a minimum of 5 dutch players for the dutch championships.

Although this number may seem low........it is a NEW tournament which will grow with time.


Last edited by acerimmer on 19.12.2006 01:02; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ruben87
Gravon Administrator


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1220
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: 19.12.2006 00:18    Post subject: Reply with quote

Until now there are 3 Dutch players (lightwing ricardo90 and me). To get 5 participans should be possible indeed.

What is the meaning of the word: ''Compusery'' ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
acerimmer
Alter Hase


Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 725
Location: England

PostPosted: 19.12.2006 01:07    Post subject: Reply with quote

sorry....mis spelling.
missed the L out.

If riskytom was around.......I am sure he would be up for it.......he is a keen UL player. (anyone know his e-mail address.......so i can give him an invite?

Others on the list may be tempted too.......lets hope so.

Ace
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lightwing
Alter Hase


Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 393
Location: rotterdam

PostPosted: 19.12.2006 01:18    Post subject: Reply with quote

<< NOT ME
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
acerimmer
Alter Hase


Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 725
Location: England

PostPosted: 19.12.2006 01:42    Post subject: Reply with quote

after your humiliating 2-0 defeat to a UL newbie (he only ever played 4 UL games in his LIFE) ..........then i don't blame you.
Anyway I guess you would get in trouble playing here.....when your a meta mod.

It doesn't bother me in slightest.

I am just trying to help the game in YOUR country.

Spending my FREE time organising tournaments for stratego PLAYERS, as well as doing admin for these kind of things......isn't exactly my ideal evening activity........(I WOULD MUCH RATHER BE PLAYING STRATEGO, than doing admin stuff)............but i am willing to do this.......to help the game.
I receive nothing in return for doing these things.........so why the hell would i be bothered if you didn't play?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lightwing
Alter Hase


Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 393
Location: rotterdam

PostPosted: 19.12.2006 16:59    Post subject: Reply with quote

1) I don't think it should be any problem, for M.
2) A lot of UL players, who definitly -, can still win, by lotto / luck, etc. Not my type of game.
3) "so why the hell would i be bothered if you didn't play?" Just saying, I won't join, because you mentioned my name before.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
acerimmer
Alter Hase


Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 725
Location: England

PostPosted: 19.12.2006 19:57    Post subject: Reply with quote

How can you say there is a large slice of luck in the game of U.L.???

Is there luck in a game of chess?

The luck factor is probably less than 1% in U.L.

There can be little of NO luck factor......just bad judgement and poor mistakes. The loss of a game in U.L. is basically down to either bad judgement or a player making a bad mistake.

In U.L............there is NO lotto that can not be stopped. It is not a game for the lotto players......it is a game for tactical minds.

If there was any shade of luck involved in the game of U.L.........then my current win % for the past 18 months on Gravon.....would not be 98.6% wins. (slightly higher than my win % at meta: 98.5% wins in U.L. at meta in over 500 games) This equates to a 98.5% win % over the 2 sites in over 700 games.

211 wins in my last 214 games on Gravon (in U.L.)
If luck played an important role......then NOONE would have such a high win % .
The 3 games that i have lost.......i can honestly say......"i didn't lose because i was unlucky", I lost 3 games because I made mistakes in those games.

If you can't figure out how to defend your flag........then i guess U.L. is not the game for you.........it takes a little more thought than your basic classic game. Maybe the tactics involved in U.L........are just a little bit too advanced for you.
No shame in this lightwing!

I accept and respect your honesty in admitting your interlect is not quite up to the task of playing in this tournament.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ruben87
Gravon Administrator


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1220
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: 22.12.2006 18:25    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ace, the luckfactor in UL is of course higher than the Chess luck factor. This Because in UL the set up is valuable.

There are also not as much pieces as Classic in the game, so I think UL is more a luck game than classic is.

Your argument of you own win % is of course useless and rubbish. Because more than 90% of your oponents are newbies in UL, and many of them dont even know the rules of the game.

However I agree with you that Skill is far more important than Luck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lightwing
Alter Hase


Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 393
Location: rotterdam

PostPosted: 22.12.2006 19:50    Post subject: Reply with quote

He did not even dare to play Vs. Keyser_Soze ,Í'm glaf I ended ace his winning streak !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
acerimmer
Alter Hase


Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 725
Location: England

PostPosted: 23.12.2006 01:30    Post subject: Reply with quote

ruben and lightwing you are both wrong.

let me first deal with lightwings comments.
Quote:
He did not even dare to play Vs. Keyser_Soze ,Í'm glaf I ended ace his winning streak !


wrong lightwing! I played keyser 5 times on meta and twice on gravon......7 games in total this year.
Have a guess what the score was?

Yes......you guessed right...... 7-0 to me.

As for you ending my winning streak......well it has to end sometime....noone can be brilliant ALL the time......I make mistakes from time to time. I took you for a chump......and you were not that bad. Not good, but not bad.
If I played you again........you would be given more respect and would be duely punnished.
If we played 10 games of U.L........you would do well to win 1 of them.


As for ruben87's comments:
Quote:
Ace, the luckfactor in UL is of course higher than the Chess luck factor. This Because in UL the set up is valuable.

Of course the setup is valuable......and indeed there is skill with choosing a strong and secure setup which is not too vunerable. There is no luck with the design of a persons setup. Having a good setup is part of the game.
For example......if you put your flag on the front row.....then there is no luck when the opponent strikes this piece with a scout........it is merely a insecure place to keep the flag.

Quote:
There are also not as much pieces as Classic in the game, so I think UL is more a luck game than classic is.


WRONG!!!! VERY WRONG!!!!!
Your lack of U.L. experiance is showing now ruben.
I have played over 1000 U.L. games online + many games over the boardgame.......so i can confidently say "tactically i know much more than you.....about this game.
With only half the pieces on the board it is much easier to avoid a high piece intent on lottoing you (unless you decide to play a block setup). Just by merely having some space to run away......you can easily avoid capture in a U.L. game. In classic......if a player lotto's you with a high piece from the start of the game......you will have problems finding escape routes for endangered pieces......thus making lotto far more productive in classic, compared to U.L.
As you already know......the agresion rule in U.L. makes lotto (lotto being the majority of luck within ANY stratego game) a very poor tool.


Quote:
Your argument of you own win % is of course useless and rubbish. Because more than 90% of your oponents are newbies in UL, and many of them dont even know the rules of the game.

WRONG AGAIN!
If you actually bothered to check.....rather than assume these things.......you would find this not to be the case.

Firstly......every player who I introduce to the game......I tell them the rules......and the rules are typed on the screen for each new player to refer to......should they need it.

Secondly.......my games are open to whoever may join.......no exceptions.

Thirdly.........you will find games against newbies are less often than you think....you say 90%????
Try 25%......that is much nearer the actual figure.
In a way.....you could be right.....it depends what you call a newbie?
If you mean a player who has played less than 100 U.L. games.....then maybe your not too far off the mark.
My definition of a newbie is someone who does not own a kliere ranking.

But maybe a true definition of a newbie is someone who really doesn't have a clue how to play the game. If this was the case......then I have played LESS than 10% of games against newbies. (don't forget these so called newbies......are seasoned classic players.....and the game plays just like classic......apart from the 5 rules changes) Usually within 3 games they have learnt alot and have developed enough U.L. knowledge to provide decent opposition.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ruben87
Gravon Administrator


Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 1220
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: 25.12.2006 14:49    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ace, Most of your arguments are not worth a thing. For example the idea to put the flag in the front row and the argument that because you have played many games you know best. By the way I don’t think I am an inexperienced UL player.

Also a funny thing is that you lotto yourself too sometimes.

I would like to inform you that there are only 7 players with a Kleier rating. So I think my 90% is closer than your 25%. Of course they cant beat you when they play their first (to tenth) game, even when you tell them the rules.

Your ‘’secondly’’ remark is unnecessary, I never accused you that you did not join everyone.

Conclusion: A lot of rubbish in your post again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
acerimmer
Alter Hase


Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 725
Location: England

PostPosted: 26.12.2006 06:29    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Ace, Most of your arguments are not worth a thing. For example the idea to put the flag in the front row and the argument that because you have played many games you know best. By the way I don’t think I am an inexperienced UL player.


ruben: my arguments are very valid!

the argument about the front row being a dumb place to have the flag.....is a valid argument........over simplified.......but valid. Maybe that went a little above your head.......so hear is another analagie which hopefully may convince you, that your setup is very important and a skillful act.
consider this: any player who sets up with the flag on one side of the board.....protected by a seargent and a miner.........while placing the marshall, general and colonel on the other side of the board.......can not complain of being "lottoed" by a luitenant (if anyone can be lottoed by a luitenant?) and losing the game. It would not be unlucky.......it would be a dumb place to put the flag. This would be a loss through an unskillful setup/ dumb setup.........not a loss by being unlucky.

You say you don't think of yourself as inexperianced in U.L...........but your words prove otherwise. If you were as experianced within the game...as I......then you would see.....there is NO lotto.....other than lotto you permit to happen.
This i learnt from experiance..........my first 200 games were not brilliant.......i was still undergoing my studies of the game. My first 150 games here......saw nearly 40 losses. My first 50 games at meta saw nearly 10 losses. 50 losses in 200.........since then i have graduated and understand the game better than anyone. Since then I have averaged 98.5% wins.
You have only played around 60 U.L. games and still have yet to graduate. You are a worthy opponent.....but still........you are 0-11 against me.
My betting is......our next 11 games will either be another 11-0 for me......or 10-1 (if you catch me on a bad day). The reason why it will be 11-0 AGAIN.......is because I know i will win....UNLESS i make a mistake.......and i don't make too many mistakes in U.L.

Quote:
Also a funny thing is that you lotto yourself too sometimes.

95% of the time........my so called lotto.....is a tactical decision based on the game board situation at the time. (in other words......it is a 100% certainty that my attacking of an unmoved or unseen piece will gain either a tactical position within the board OR a positive piece advantage.

On the odd occasion where I do need to take a chance......and actually do some real lottoing (yes it does happen from time to time......but not often) then I will do it.......but it is a last resort.......which would be brought on by a mistake earlier in the game.

Quote:
I would like to inform you that there are only 7 players with a Kleier rating. So I think my 90% is closer than your 25%


WRONG!

Try looking at the kleier all rankings.............all these players have a kleier ranking........(the only reason they are not in the normal rankings....is because they have not played enough games within the last couple of months.)
Therefore my estimated 25% IS CORRECT.


Quote:
Of course they cant beat you when they play their first (to tenth) game, even when you tell them the rules.


You underestimate these players! Some players are very good......very quickly. The rules are simple......the changes are slight......so as long as you know the rules.....it is very easy to get very good.....very quickly.
My first 4 games EVER (and i only was told the rules....at the start of these 4 games) was against WSC_Warrior (a top U.L. player).......and i beat him 4-0 (in my first 4 games ever.)
Before these 4 games.......I didn't even know what U.L. meant or the rules.......and i beat one of the best players 4-0. This shows.........you can quickly adapt to the game......and certainly don't need 10 games before you can win. To my detrement.......I have fallen to the new player defeat. atillares beat me within 6 games. baffi beat me within 3 games. mecconium beat me within 9 games. In the early days.......completely new players have beaten me first time around. The key thing I am trying to get across.....is that the tactical mind (especially with stratego classic experiance) is the main factor in a U.L. win.
This being the point........a new player with good tactical abilities......will be a tremendous foe......even for a player new to the game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cosmo
Fortgeschrittener


Joined: 23 Jun 2003
Posts: 102
Location: UK

PostPosted: 26.12.2006 22:53    Post subject: Reply with quote

few points
1 didnt know u mailed me few months ago ACE do now but little late sry didnt reply
2 putting flag in front row is dumb hmmmmmmmmmm well that depends if the one doing it believes he's good enough to pull it off doesnt it ? for example i have a set up as you know ace with flag right in the middle 2nd back and have used it about 8 times of which ive won 7 should have been 8 only i screwed up endgame stupidly blowing up my colonal instead of my marshal other than that my flag was never under threat in any of the games so is it really that dumb ?
3 you say 20% luck id say more like 65% i mean all depends what you consider luck and what you consider skill for example i lost in 12 moves before , not down to skill however but bad luck id say marshal and general were side by side on my left side lotto'd straight down my marshal was pinned by my captains and even though i got his general wham i lost my marshal he rescued run general down and bomb got his marshal but my flag was taken ,i call it bad luck because if his marshal and general were swapped he was screwed but as luck had it my setup wasnt made for a lotto flank run lol but i did learn a lot from that loss and i did get revenge , after yrs of playing i was able to just look at opponents setup and know right off where flag was not 100% but i had pretty good idea and would often just attack that area and get flag which i'm sure opponent would be muttering lucky #%## so to him or her total luck but from my view yes luck but mostly good judgement , i had an uncanny nack of knowing what piece was advancing for example a sergeant and id beat it with a sergeant Lucky ? or Skill ? most would say total luck perhaps so but in ul you need luck . leaving a general entire game on back line and opponent thinking bomb and thus losing them game another example is that just bad luck ? or great trickery on my part ? whatever % anyone thinks its still part of the game sometimes more than other times
4 as for playing newbies
i gotta say often they are harder to beat than experienced players because they do moves that make no sense and that you cant expect and that sometimes can cost you so can over confidence .

thats all power went out once already and im not starting over a 3rd time lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Gravon - Das Spielerparadies Forum Index -> Stratego-Archiv All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group