| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wsc_warrior
User
Joined: 29 May 2003
Posts: 49
Location: Michigan
|
 Posted: 14.05.2004 22:10 Post subject: |
 |
|
Well for me, I just look at the WSC rating, Thats what I started with so I am used to it. You have a better chance to go up in rating than Kleier system.
But I am just one person, so if it matters not not.
Warrior Out |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
acerimmer
Alter Hase
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 725
Location: England
|
| Posted: 21.10.2006 07:06 Post subject: Good idea from ghochan |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Maybe we need two tiers of competition. A "masters" ranking for those who play above a certain number of games per month and just a "rating" for everybody else. If a master's ranked person falls below the required number of games, they would go back down into the regular pool. The master's list could use a more aggressive point based system while the pool could, perhaps, be based on kleier (or opposite, if that is a better way to do it). Just a thought. |
Very Interesting idea! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
