SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Ranking or Ranking 2005 (Kleier)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Gravon - Das Spielerparadies Forum Index -> English
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
-deleted129
Fortgeschrittener


Joined: 29 May 2003
Posts: 117
Location: Down in the South of Holland

PostPosted: 20.04.2005 23:59    Post subject: Ranking or Ranking 2005 (Kleier) Reply with quote

Just curious:

Which Ranking is more popular?
The total Ranking or the 2005 Ranking?

I made a bad start on my first 15 games... lost 10 of them.
Didn't know how Gravon worked at that moment.

When these 10 are erased it would look a bit better for me

Wussy
_________________
S t r a t e g o - C l u b - N a p o l e o n
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
esquire
Alter Hase


Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 383
Location: Michigan, USA

PostPosted: 21.04.2005 00:09    Post subject: Reply with quote

Overall is more important. But it is so hard to move up in it that I like the WSC rating.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
OGETARTS
Alter Hase


Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Posts: 321
Location: United States

PostPosted: 21.04.2005 00:53    Post subject: Re: Ranking or Ranking 2005 (Kleier) Reply with quote

SC Napoleon wrote:
I made a bad start on my first 15 games... lost 10 of them.
Didn't know how Gravon worked at that moment.

When these 10 are erased it would look a bit better for me

Wussy

Luc - The same thing kind of happened to me. I didn't play a bunch of unranked games before I joined Gravon. I played 1 unranked game against lightwing and then started playing ranked games. That obviously hurt my overall ranking because A.) I was still learning and trying to get comfortable at Gravon and B.) I had no clue how Kleier's ranking system worked. I don't think I fully understood his ranking system until maybe 6 or 7 weeks after I started playing. I still find it confusing at times, but it seems like a good system.

To answer your question, I think overall is more important, but 2005 is more accurate as far as a player’s current strength. For instance, generalMax has an overall rating of 1623, but in 2005 he is 1831. That is a big difference and it probably means he didn't play as well in the beginning, but right now he's playing better than everyone at Gravon (not counting Lion and several others that haven't played in long time).

OGE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Gravon - Das Spielerparadies Forum Index -> English All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group