200 GAMES

[bolivar]

My opinion is that a player should play at least 200 games in a year to be ranked, otherwise no ranking at the end of the year!!!!
_________________
i play anyone from top to bottom and i think everyone should do the same!!!!!!

[jensneuij]

My opinion is that they should atleast play 1 game. Every game counts

[samuel]

So that would mean all those who have played 200 games wouldn't get to include the games against those who have not in their list of games? What if you beat someone 100 times but he only plays 150 games in total? Your 100 wins don't count?!

[bolivar]

Every game should count also against players who have played less then 200 games. Razoa may be a good player but 94 games in a whole year and at the top of the ranking is ridiculous.
_________________
i play anyone from top to bottom and i think everyone should do the same!!!!!!

[sohal]

Do you really think 100 games is not accurate ?

Take a look at my history and Adq/Non-Adq ratio : 70/24
it's probably the better gravon's ratio
that's mean i play every player, especially strong one's

I played like 500 games this year but on the 3 sites (grav, meta, strat)

[ruben87]

[stratego]

hi,

a part of the rule is:

...All other ranking rules are applied additionally (at least 20 rated games and at least 25 games per quarter of year).

see full rules at top of the yearly ranking site.

and 100 games a year (25 each quarter) is a good parameter.
on one hand the player must be around and play games on the other hand
we can built (with a basis of 100 games) a stable ranking.

stratego

[samuel]

But it is a shame Razoa did not enter the online tournament won by Zach this year. This is also a good test against the top players. Perhaps next time?