2013 Players Who Played Highest % of Non Adequate Players

[unbiasbob]

These are players outside the top 20 who play the highest percentage of their games against non adequate players. In other words players who are more than 200 points below them in the 2013 challenge rankings. these are players with at least 200 games played

Samuel leads the pack here with a whopping 40% of his games against non adequates

1. Samuel 182 non adequates out of 459 games = 39.65%. He really must fear those players within 200 points of his ranking.

2. Dozer - 134 non ads for a 32.37%. he was always the poster child for humpers but no longer. Samuel has taken his crown with ruben moving up

3. wulf - 30.85%

4. guru - 29.09%

5. RUBEN87 - yes Ruben87 breaks into the top 10 with his pal Samuel. he has played 52 non adequates out of 235 games for a 22.32% of no adequates played. Looks like Sammy's habits have rubbed off on him. LOL

6. unbiasbob - 193 non adequates out of 894 games for a 21.59%. yes Rube beat me in this category folks. he always wanted to win

7. Rave55 - 8.61% - a low number and not really worth mentioning.

these are your Winners. congrats to all and be proud

[samuel]

I love your determination Bob. So lets get this straight - first we're going to rule out the entire top 20 players for some strange reason. And then we're going to rule out all those who haven't played 200 games. 200!!!

And even then there is still an obvious pattern here where the guys you have listed (except yourself interestingly) are somewhere between 21 and 28 in the standings (and Guru is just below at 32 but still has a rating of well over 1500). Clearly, the players with a rating well above 1500 are going to play more non-adequates than players down in the 1400's or 1300s because there are fewer adequates to go up against.

And despite all that, there you are in with the big boys of the 1500 club, despite your lowly 59th spot on the table. No one near you in the rankings even comes close. Everyone else on your list can play respectable players who are around the 1300 mark, but will have such games recorded as non adequate. But not you - you can play all those guys and they will be adequate games....and yet there you are on your own list!

Once again Bob, making you look foolish has been a pleasure.

[ruben87]

[samuel]

I've just worked out who the biggest douche-bag on Gravon is.

Basically if you don't count the first 58 players in the rankings, and then if you look at anyone ranked 60 or below who has played 1 game or more this year and discard those players, the list is as follows:

1. Unbiasbob


The leader used to be Unbiasbob, but that was when only players ranked 55th could be counted. Since I have now changed that Unbiasbob, ranked 59th, finds himself top of the list. So Unbiasbob has managed to supersede himself as the biggest douchebag on Gravon. Congratulations!

[quicksilver]

unbiasbob 894 games and 1453 rating rank 59


110 played above 1453

784 games below 1453

Even if we would focus more it would be much worse, but why wasting time !!!


btw 1600+ and 150+ games makes a decent stratego player (1700+ good and 1800+ TOP)

adequates games means nothing, only that you get ranked


Please Mr. Edit STOP !!!

[ruben87]