| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		wellington Fortgeschrittener
 
  Joined: 01 Mar 2003 Posts: 122 Location: Amsterdam
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: 30.01.2007 19:18    Post subject: Kleier rating explained | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Many discussions were hold about the Kleier rating. People who say it isnt good are right.
 
 
For example:
 
 
wellington vs player x (a newbie with 1230 points)
 
wellington wins and receives no points.
 
 
Now the newbie gets better and better. I might get a point now, because the newbie is moving up in the ranking. This isnt fair policy as i played the newbie when he was still in his bad period. You have to reward points for the moment you play!
 
 
Well thats just my opinion  
 
 
w. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		stratego Chief-Admin
  
  Joined: 20 May 2003 Posts: 1123 Location: Germany
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: 30.01.2007 21:07    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				hi wellington,
 
 
you get points - maybe - if you have so many games - it doesnt really matter,
 
but this happends and is a known fact. 
 
any questions about the ranking? read hermanns infos about it at his side.
 
 
stratego
 
 
www.stratego-verband.de  then choose RANKING from menue. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		sadistic Alter Hase
 
  Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 820 Location: Florida, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: 30.01.2007 23:09    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| Dump that rubbish rating system. It blows. WSC should be the only rating system. If a player newbie humps excessively, we can always juice him up with my infamous electro therapy boomer. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |