View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wellington Fortgeschrittener
Joined: 01 Mar 2003 Posts: 122 Location: Amsterdam
|
Posted: 30.01.2007 19:18 Post subject: Kleier rating explained |
|
|
Many discussions were hold about the Kleier rating. People who say it isnt good are right.
For example:
wellington vs player x (a newbie with 1230 points)
wellington wins and receives no points.
Now the newbie gets better and better. I might get a point now, because the newbie is moving up in the ranking. This isnt fair policy as i played the newbie when he was still in his bad period. You have to reward points for the moment you play!
Well thats just my opinion
w. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stratego Chief-Admin

Joined: 20 May 2003 Posts: 1123 Location: Germany
|
Posted: 30.01.2007 21:07 Post subject: |
|
|
hi wellington,
you get points - maybe - if you have so many games - it doesnt really matter,
but this happends and is a known fact.
any questions about the ranking? read hermanns infos about it at his side.
stratego
www.stratego-verband.de then choose RANKING from menue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sadistic Alter Hase
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 820 Location: Florida, USA
|
Posted: 30.01.2007 23:09 Post subject: |
|
|
Dump that rubbish rating system. It blows. WSC should be the only rating system. If a player newbie humps excessively, we can always juice him up with my infamous electro therapy boomer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|