SUMMARY ABOUT KLEIER SYSTEM FOR SPION

[Agresor]

ANSWER TO YOUR ANSWER SPION:
1. If a better player loses against a weaker player there should be no
doubt to CHANGE his rating points.
2. Strength should be be changed because players are developing too.
3.Players who do not play are worse than those who play regularly.
4.With such a depressive system as Kleier you can expect less and less quality games.
5. A definition of a "well defined" player is logically and mathematically insuficient.
6.The goal is to have active players and not a virtual rating.
7. Players do not play for money as B. Becker but they have fun and some of them want to be
regularly active and rewarded with a changeable rating.
This is the least you could do for your players in order to develop their game.


sincerely Agresor

[apollo]

Agressor makes one very big point. The Kleier system is very boring and shows very little change from month to month. It seems players stay pretty close to their ranking number no matter what. And , hey, maybe thats what it's supposed to do.


Apollo