View previous topic :: View next topic |
Should players play 5 games a month to stay in Rankings |
Yes |
|
61% |
[ 11 ] |
No |
|
38% |
[ 7 ] |
|
Total Votes : 18 |
|
Author |
Message |
esquire Alter Hase
Joined: 12 Mar 2004 Posts: 383 Location: Michigan, USA
|
Posted: 29.01.2006 22:25 Post subject: Spion--can we change the rating requirements |
|
|
How about 5 games per a month in order to stay on the ranking page. If you do not play 5 games in a month, your rating will not show up again until you do. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sadistic Alter Hase
Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 820 Location: Florida, USA
|
Posted: 30.01.2006 01:32 Post subject: |
|
|
Like I said before, pull out the dead weeds! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
art Alter Hase
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Posts: 325 Location: USA
|
Posted: 09.02.2006 07:50 Post subject: |
|
|
Why not just have web pages that could respond to any rules that you supply. It could be 5 or more per month, 10 per month, or minimum # of games played for the whole year etc. Then you guys can have your own customized ratings pages and dwell on 'dem numbers for hours at your own pleasure. Something about a mouse's rear comes to mind (who gives?). Just kidding really it would be nice to have.
But seriously, Also why not when you click on your own or another single players history that the games that they have played versus ranked players show the actual rating that was in effect at the start of the game back to whenever it was. This would allow you to trend players rankings that you used to beat and now whip you, or for Sadistic it would show his opponent's gradual descent into humiliation as his oppenent's rating falls. The shock therapy candidates. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ricardo90 Alter Hase
Joined: 23 Oct 2004 Posts: 639 Location: the Netherlands, Rotterdam-Ridderkerk
|
Posted: 29.08.2006 22:01 Post subject: |
|
|
yes 5 games a month is the best you can do i think. _________________ OWNAGE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|