View previous topic :: View next topic |
Which idea do you prefer ? |
1st |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
2nd |
|
80% |
[ 8 ] |
|
Total Votes : 10 |
|
Author |
Message |
-deleted147 User
Joined: 03 Jul 2003 Posts: 42 Location: Darnétal, France
|
Posted: 09.08.2005 02:19 Post subject: Play the tournament games: |
|
|
When we will have the teams, for play the tournament i have 2 ideas for play the games:
1st:
All players of your team will play against all others players of all the teams, it is the longer idea, ex:
Team1 vs Team2
WSC_Junior vs ESQUIRE
WSC_Junior vs Wussy
WSC_Junior vs art
WSC_Junior vs flamer
Bounty vs ESQUIRE
Bounty vs Wussy
Bounty vs art
Bounty vs flamer
playa1 vs ESQUIRE
playa1 vs Wussy
playa1 vs art
playa1 vs flamer
Thomas vs ESQUIRE
Thomas vs Wussy
Thomas vs art
Thomas vs flamer
2nd:
The players will play against these players who are at the same place of the opponent team (that is shorter):
Team1 vs Team2:
(1)playa1 vs (1)Wussy
(2)WSC_Junior vs (2)ESQUIRE
(3)Bounty vs (3)flamer
(4) Thomas vs (4) art
Team3 vs Team4:
(1)gpet0 vs (1)Flame
(2)citron505 vs (2)Maximus
(3)oli vs (3)miltos41
(4)endever vs (4)akritas
and it till the end...
Which idea do you prefer ?
Have fun
Junior |
|
Back to top |
|
|
-deleted594 Fortgeschrittener
Joined: 20 Jun 2005 Posts: 83 Location: Vermont
|
Posted: 09.08.2005 02:22 Post subject: |
|
|
hi Junior
I prefer the 1st |
|
Back to top |
|
|
esquire Alter Hase
Joined: 12 Mar 2004 Posts: 383 Location: Michigan, USA
|
Posted: 09.08.2005 02:33 Post subject: |
|
|
It has to be the option where you DON'T play everyone on the other team. Please read the rules. People on each team are 1-4, teams can pick numbers based on anything. Then I get the numbers--when I get all numbers, then I will post matchups. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
-deleted129 Fortgeschrittener
Joined: 29 May 2003 Posts: 117 Location: Down in the South of Holland
|
Posted: 09.08.2005 20:25 Post subject: |
|
|
I prefer the second option.
The first opinion reqs a player to play 4 games.
We all know there always be people who do not show up or are not able to play.
In the second form there is only ONE opponent who deals with the sh*t when a player is not "there".
I ventilated my oppinion.
Wussy _________________ S t r a t e g o - C l u b - N a p o l e o n
Last edited by -deleted129 on 10.08.2005 22:38; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
generalmax Fortgeschrittener
Joined: 16 May 2004 Posts: 114 Location: Up in northern Slovenia!
|
Posted: 10.08.2005 19:41 Post subject: |
|
|
i prefer second because its logical
I have an idea
there will be tables
Like:
table1:captain(team1)-captain(team2)
table2:player-player
table3:player-player
table4:player-player
my team need player who has in worst case 1392 points!
Give me post reply everyone are welcome! _________________ The General |
|
Back to top |
|
|
-deleted129 Fortgeschrittener
Joined: 29 May 2003 Posts: 117 Location: Down in the South of Holland
|
Posted: 10.08.2005 22:43 Post subject: |
|
|
This is how we did it in januari:
http://www26.brinkster.com/scnapoleon/Cop2005/
Table with four playes left, four right.
Board A player #1 vs player #1
Board B .. .. etc
Wussy
PS
There are faces on the pictures which are on a regular base on Gravon.
JvG, noes, apocalypse, JFK, lightwing, ricardo90, Pharos, playa1, LordOfTheAges, Lion, Daffy and Wussy _________________ S t r a t e g o - C l u b - N a p o l e o n |
|
Back to top |
|
|
-deleted147 User
Joined: 03 Jul 2003 Posts: 42 Location: Darnétal, France
|
Posted: 10.08.2005 23:55 Post subject: |
|
|
hi
We have talk and we are going to take the option2:
For the points it is 3 points for a win 1 point for a draw and 0 for a loss ex:
My team win 2 games and the opponent team too, that is a draw (2-2), 1 point dor the 2 teams
If my team won 3 or more games again the opponent team my team won 3 points and the opponent team 0.
thanks
junior |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bounty Fortgeschrittener
Joined: 25 Jul 2003 Posts: 66
|
Posted: 11.08.2005 21:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Bounty was there too Wussy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|